4 ms·
In case it completely dies there are archives now available: http://web.archive.org/web/20210712193555/http://fxip.as203478.net/ http://web.archive.org/web/202
by kevincox 5y ago
In case it completely dies there are archives now available:
http://web.archive.org/web/20210712193555/http://fxip.as203478.net/ http://web.archive.org/web/20210712193555/http://fxip.as2034...
https://archive.is/5a44i https://archive.is/5a44i
Or the whole thing is small enough to fit in a comment:
> GET / HTTP/1.1
> Host: fxip.as203478.net
> User-Agent: curl/7.76.1
> Accept: */*
>
* Mark bundle as not supporting multiuse
* HTTP 1.0, assume close after body
< HTTP/1.0 200 OK
< Server: uIP/1.0 http://www.sics.se/~adam/uip/
< Connection: close
< Content-type: text/html
<
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Casio fx-9750GII Webserver</title>
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Lato&display=swap" rel="stylesheet">
<style type="text/css">
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
*:focus
{
outline: none;
}
*::-moz-focus-inner
{
border: 0;
}
body
{
background: #fafafa;
font-family: "Lato", sans-serif;
font-size: 100%;
text-align: center;
}
a
{
color: #0075BF; }
a:not(:hover):not(:focus):not(:active) {
text-decoration: none;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<br>
<h1>Casio fx-9750GII Webserver</h1><br>
Welcome!
This page is hosted on an Casio fx-9750GII graphical calculator, running a SuperH SH4 processor.<br>
It's running a port of the uIP TCP/IP stack, using SLIP over the 3pin 2.5mm serial port.<br>
<br>
<a href="https://github.com/Manawyrm/fxIP" target="_blank">Firmware (uIP port, webserver implementation)</a>
<br><br>
<img src="https://screenshot.tbspace.de/vfscewyjzir.jpg" style="width: 700px;"><br>
<img src="https://screenshot.tbspace.de/ijlnydgsvkw.jpg" style="width: 700px;"><br>
<i>(these pictures are not hosted on the calculator.)</i>
<br><br>
</body>
</html
- luke2m 5y agoThanks.
- amelius 5y agoSo most of the content (images, font) is hosted elsewhere ...
- stjohnswarts 5y agoof course just like with most places using content providers :) . It would take forever (relatively)to pull those off the casio vs the html text for the page.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- forgotmypw17 5y ago*:focus { outline: none; } *::-moz-focus-inner { border: 0; } Wow, the equivalent of having a building with existing wheelchair ramps and ripping them out because they're "unsightly". I guess it's a valid decision decision, but pretty crappy for anyone who needs them.
- busymom0 5y agois that to imply that focus outline is meant for accessibility purposes?
- forgotmypw17 5y agoYes, focus rectangles are an essential component of navigating the interface with the keyboard.
- busymom0 5y agoFair. But if a user has accessibility enabled, that should override the css itself no? Also even with the focus outline disabled on other sites, I am able to navigate with the keyboard to text input fields. OP's site doesn't have any input fields so not sure why they have that CSS in place as I don't think it's doing anything.
- forgotmypw17 5y agoYou are making the assumption that the user has some modicum of control over the browser's configuration.
- busymom0 5y agoNo I am not. Users who require accessibility have it setup in their MacOS/Windows settings. It's a global setting for them. It's not website specific.