3 ms·
It’s the study of the “mind” (not brain). It’s very basis is the study of a pseudo-religious phenomenon. Neuroscience is real science because it studies the bra
by luffapi 5y ago
It’s the study of the “mind” (not brain). It’s very basis is the study of a pseudo-religious phenomenon. Neuroscience is real science because it studies the brain not the artificial and archaic concept of the mind.
There can be personal value in studying psychology. It’s just not science, it’s fictional.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- dash2 5y agoHow does this critique apply, e.g. to Jonathan Haidt's work on moral foundations? Or, if you want something more rigorous, to prospect theory and other decision theorists' attempts to build simple tractable models of decision-making?
- disgruntledphd2 5y ago> It’s the study of the “mind” (not brain). It’s very basis is the study of a pseudo-religious phenomenon So you don't believe in the existence of qualia? That's a pretty strong philosophical position.