> I’m well versed enough with psychology. I even remember when people took the DSMIV seriously! That's the manual of psychiatry (which is a very, very differen

> I’m well versed enough with psychology. I even remember when people took the DSMIV seriously! That's the manual of psychiatry (which is a very, very different thing) right? DSM's only interaction with the field of psychology is for insurance purposes for therapists who are also psychologists. I mean, I read it when I was doing a psychology undergrad, but it definitely wasn't something that was required. FWIW, I think that you may not be defining psychology the same way as many of the commentators here.