3 ms·
Why? You might disagree but the article is interesting? Can you also assert that there’s nothing “natural” you can do that would systematically help with COVID
by Trufa 5y ago
Why? You might disagree but the article is interesting?
Can you also assert that there’s nothing “natural” you can do that would systematically help with COVID prevention? Quitting smoking, running, healthy inmune system with dieting and so on?
- Tenoke 5y agoThat's not particularly alternative, it's interventions completely accepted by the medical system.
- tokai 5y agoQuitting smoking is not what natural means here. Natural & Alternative is a catch all term for holistic medicine.
- secretsatan 5y agoThat's not what he means and you know it.
- Trufa 5y agoI’m honestly not sure what he means. I may disagree with most, but I’m just surprised about people stopping reading when they hear something they disagree with. It’s not even the central point of the article.
- eplanit 5y agoIt's stopping reading at a sentence dripping with pseudo intellectualism. When writers try too hard to sound intelligent and erudite it's off-putting, and a "bullshit" indicator.
- worldsayshi 5y agoI agree that it puts me off as well but it's also feels a bit like a no true Scotsman fallacy. If we're always on the lookout for "bad words" then we will eventually set up impossible standards for how we speak.
- spurgu 5y agoYeah this is a major problem in the political landscape overall. Like for example refusing to read anything by conservatives just because you happen to disagree with them on abortion issues. You're going to be a) missing out on a lot of insights and b) even worse, create a divide where you can't even understand the other side anymore just because you outright refuse to hear them out. I tripped on that sentence myself but continued reading since it seemed like a minor point to the actual story and I wasn't disappointed.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]