4 ms·
Having only read the introduction of this paper myself, this seems to be an apt summary of its contents. Also worth noting that the language in this paper is v
by no-dr-onboard 5y ago
Having only read the introduction of this paper myself, this seems to be an apt summary of its contents.
Also worth noting that the language in this paper is very approachable and rife with footnotes that often point to past legal decisions, if not precedents. Even if you don't agree with the thesis of this paper, it still makes for an eloquent and informative read of one side of the aisle.
- uniqueuid 5y agoWell, it is a scholarly law paper. [edit] To clarify: Being a scholarly law paper means that (1) it is well-documented and thoroughly researched, but also (2) it may employ words that seem to have a common-sense meaning but really don't. Things such as "fair", "bias", "access", "responsible" etc. have very precise legal meanings that are not readily apparent.