3 ms·
This isn't about Mark Cuban's losses per se, I also have no issue with him (an accredited investor) getting bilked for some change between the couch cushions -
by arcticbull 5y ago
This isn't about Mark Cuban's losses per se, I also have no issue with him (an accredited investor) getting bilked for some change between the couch cushions - the issue is even if an incredibly sophisticated investor like Mark could fall for such a rug-pull/failure then how can we possibly expect unsophisticated investors not to get bamboozled? Remember, those who wash out of trading end up beneficiaries of the state bankruptcy and welfare programs, so the state very much has an interest in this.
Crypto now is like trading stocks was before and leading up to the great depression: a bunch of hucksters, shills, snake-oil salesmen and unrestricted margin. And a few well-intentioned people. Before the Securities Act, the Securities Exchange Act, Regulation T and the SEC.
The great finance speed-run has reached mid-1929.
[edit] Seriously if the Fed has to cough up $60 billion dollars to bail out Tether, I'm going to be incredibly pissed off.
- nradov 5y agoThat is exactly why no one should be trading cryptocurrency. Anyone who does so deserves to lose everything. I don't want the SEC wasting my tax money protecting those idiots.
- gjs278 5y agostay poor
- yellow_lead 5y agoDo you mean he's sophisticated in the general usage of the word or in the financial usage? The financial version tends to mean "has a lot of money."
- arcticbull 5y agoDefinitely that, but also the man is an investor. He should have both the knowledge and the money.
- ButtSpark69 5y agoKnowledge is heavily domain specific, it's about being 'smart' or not. Franky Cuban was just invested in a crappy coin he understood nothing about, and didn't get lucky.
- arcticbull 5y agoI will very much concede that luck and skill start to look pretty similar when you win :) I like to remind myself of that pretty regularly.