3 ms·
The insinuation is that in such a scenario there would be a strong enough disincentive. And perhaps also the incentive of not having a years long pandemic.
by datameta 5y ago
The insinuation is that in such a scenario there would be a strong enough disincentive.
And perhaps also the incentive of not having a years long pandemic.
- nradov 5y agoWhat is a strong enough disincentive? Would you recommend building physical walls along our borders and using violence against people who attempt to cross without authorization?
- datameta 5y agoNo, I wouldn't. Gosh, and if I didn't respond it would almost look like I did support that wouldn't it? Toss out these cheap tactics... There are obviously many levels on the spectrum of what could be done to sufficiently increase compliance without falling back on martial law and giving the governments more reason to erode our freedoms.
- refurb 5y agoYeah the farmer in SE Asia whose family is starving because he can’t get to market will certainly not try and break any rules. Love these solution designed by people who work from home.
- datameta 5y agoFood distribution certainly falls under essential services. Pharmacies, too. But not much else is absolutely necessary.