3 ms·
This really sucks. They’re cancelling it because they don’t need it anymore. They need something like it, but the requirements have become archaic. The fact t
by pyuser583 5y ago
This really sucks.
They’re cancelling it because they don’t need it anymore. They need something like it, but the requirements have become archaic.
The fact that this was kept up in litigation until the technology became archaic is really, really disturbing.
- ars 5y ago> The fact that this was kept up in litigation until the technology became archaic is really, really disturbing. And also, in a way, really really good. It gave them time to know what they actually need and not waste money on something they (incorrectly) thought they needed.
- lumost 5y agoThis can also describe almost every software project in history. By my estimation any project delay will incur a redesign which is 50% due to new technology being developed and 50% due to different parties in the design discussion. Even in Defense contracting land, If you delay a contract by 5 years then nobody from the original proposal will still be around. Had the contract originally gone through there would probably be incremental development to keep it up with the times.