4 ms·
In California's vehicle code, there's a rule requiring drivers to keep a reasonable speed based on conditions: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_d
by danso 5y ago
In California's vehicle code, there's a rule requiring drivers to keep a reasonable speed based on conditions:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=VEH§ionNum=22350 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySectio...
> No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.
Maintaining the speed limit as another car gives 4 seconds of signaling and spends at least a full second in your lane is arguably not "reasonable".
Where you live, if someone makes a reasonable signal to move into my lane, and I decide to not brake and rear-end them — you're saying that would be an automatic payout in my favor?
- Dylan16807 5y ago> Where you live, if someone makes a reasonable signal to move into my lane, and I decide to not brake and rear-end them — you're saying that would be an automatic payout in my favor? Even if you have an obligation to brake and mitigate the problem, the fact that you have to brake sure sounds like they are the actual cause of the problem.