There were two parts to the argument which seem to hold water. 1. Any code generated by co pilot is likely to be agpl 2. since the authors of copilot used co

There were two parts to the argument which seem to hold water. 1. Any code generated by co pilot is likely to be agpl 2. since the authors of copilot used co pilot beta to make co pilot release copilot is very likely using agpl licenced code and therefore in breach of the agpl licence. so yep, article looks flawed.