4°C being the "optimal" change and his damage function ignoring pretty much how balanced system works is not soft denial then. Soft denial is saying "climate c

4°C being the "optimal" change and his damage function ignoring pretty much how balanced system works is not soft denial then. Soft denial is saying "climate change does exist, but its impact on the population will be lower than mesures destined to curb it". I hope his grandchildren and great-grandchildren will hear this speculation.