4 ms·
Agreed. I'm still on Ivy Bridge(3rd gen) quad-core i7(laptop). Its fast for all my development needs. I put SSD couple of years ago and its quite snappy.
by ashdev 5y ago
Agreed. I'm still on Ivy Bridge(3rd gen) quad-core i7(laptop). Its fast for all my development needs. I put SSD couple of years ago and its quite snappy.
- folkhack 5y agoT430 Ivy Bridge (i7-3840QM) checking in - still kills it as a daily development system.
- ashdev 5y agoNice! 3630QM here.
- liketochill 5y agoT430s! From 2011. SSD, windows 7, 16 gb ram…still going strong!
- mbfg 5y agowhen you're developing web based, or at least network based software having 16/32 core/threads like AMD's top consumer chips it becomes pretty darn hard not to have. Once you get used to that power, it's hard to imagine less. I get it, for everyday use, it doesn't matter, but when your standing up a bunch of docker containers running a bunch of networked apps, it's a game changer.
- x3sphere 5y agoYeah the 5950x will run circles around any Haswell based CPU. I suppose for single threaded tasks, it’s still not a massive jump ( although still pretty substantial). I get that CPUs were moving at a snails pace before but AMD really shook things up with the 3000 and now 5000 series.
- Andys 5y agoI've found single core 5950x performance to be 20-30% faster in my ruby/rails benchmarks, vs my old 4 core Xeon (which had single core turbo at 4ghz). Very happy with the upgrade
- ashdev 5y agoI understand that. It's totally dependent on your needs. If you need to run multiple docker containers or VMs, then you need that power and I get that, I'd need it too in that case.