3 ms·
Vaccines are not a religion. The effectiveness of the vaccine doesn’t change if someone believe it or not. The article doesn’t prove anything, because the sampl
by sajithdilshan 5y ago
Vaccines are not a religion. The effectiveness of the vaccine doesn’t change if someone believe it or not. The article doesn’t prove anything, because the sample size is negligible. This is just a fear mongering garbage article.
- loceng 5y agoIndeed the overall health of the individuals is important, and the cause for concern is the known lower effectiveness of the mRNA vaccine on variants other than -19 - and that vaccinated people are getting it; based on everything I've read, it'll only be once we mass deploy Ivermectin as a preventative or at minimum distributed to take upon first symptoms until we abolish the virus; everyone taking preventatively would mean non-symptomatic carriers wouldn't be spreading blindly.
- Aeolun 5y ago> The article doesn’t prove anything, because the sample size is negligible. That would be true if the difference was smaller. With an effect this large it means something even with this small sample size. Nothing conclusive, but the chances of this occuring by random chance are vanishingly small (though there could be something about the behavior of people that get vaccinated that makes them less likely to get infected, instead of the vaccines themselves).