3 ms·
The content of the rant is stupid, in fact, if you read this post, DocC is "unusable," with "github" and the specific workflow of the author, not specifically w
by greatgib 5y ago
The content of the rant is stupid, in fact, if you read this post, DocC is "unusable," with "github" and the specific workflow of the author, not specifically with "open source" projects.
But, that being said, there are countless documentation from code formatter, I don't really see what particularity DocC has to be considered as excellent.
- yarcob 5y agoA very large number of open source projects use a workflow similar to the author: Source code on Github, documentation on Github pages. If a new tool doesn't work with that setup, nobody will use it.
- oefrha 5y agoThere's also a large, and probably growing number of open source projects hosting documentation on Netlify/Vercel. Somebody's definitely going to use it, and if it has enough other advantages, people will notice and migrate. And GitHub might one day support path-based SPAs, it's old news at this point. I still remember GitHub Pages being an https holdout for many years.