Sure, there’s nothing for one less space either, or anything close. > or the DoD may have listed the parent (holding) company Like which one? I think it’s the

Sure, there’s nothing for one less space either, or anything close. > or the DoD may have listed the parent (holding) company Like which one? I think it’s the reporter’s job to find out. Posting a link implying something’s there when there’s actually nothing is garbage reporting at best and malicious at worst. Here's a more likely explanation though. The "security researcher" quoted saw AS56041 China Mobile communications corporation in WHOIS, which is actually listed by DoD, rather than the aforementioned company. However, that's just the backbone provider; attributing based on that is kind of like attributing a U.S. C2 server to Hurricane Electric. The "security researcher" should probably stay away from the attribution game if they can't recognize backbone providers.