4 ms·
These seem contradictory to me: > End-to-end encryption > No user data leaves the client in plaintext. > Smart import > Upload any OFX/CSV file from any bank
by diggernet 5y ago
These seem contradictory to me:
> End-to-end encryption
> No user data leaves the client in plaintext.
> Smart import
> Upload any OFX/CSV file from any bank in the world. Leave the rest to us.
Edit: To clarify, "No way for us to sell your data or even peek into it" is more the contradiction I had in mind than just end-to-end encryption.
- dkzlv 5y agoCan you elaborate a little bit on what you find contradictory in these statements?
- diggernet 5y agoSure... If the OFX/CSV we upload is encrypted before we upload it, how can you process it ("Leave the rest to us"). Conversely, if you are processing the OFX/CSV, how can you not peek into it?
- dkzlv 5y agoOh, I see. OFX/CSV files are processed on the client-side, and we never get the raw file, only the processed and encrypted transactions. Does that make sense?
- dkzlv 5y agoOoooh, I get it! “Upload” is a bad word for that. Will change it to something else, thanks!
- diggernet 5y agoYup, I think that's where the mental conflict comes from. How about "import"?
- nostalgiac 5y agoI don't think any word will do it justice. I would spell out that it's done client-side and what information is/isn't uploaded.