Here's the cited tweet: https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1408124343700369411 https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1408124343700369411 I don't think "slammed" is too h

Here's the cited tweet: https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1408124343700369411 https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1408124343700369411 I don't think "slammed" is too harsh of a description. After her critique about the Senators drafting this bill all being white: > This is not to say that any/all bipartisan deals are bad but it’s to ask people to actually read what’s inside them instead of assume bipartisan=good But surely, as a member of Congress, she has access to the details of this deal, and can opine on it specifically? Instead of opining on bipartisan deals as an abstraction? Wouldn't her constituents rather know, specifically, if this deal will help them or not and whether she would vote for it, and why?