4 ms·
The parent poster is not talking about "the idea of UFOs", they're talking about aliens among us! This is an issue - as this disconnect shows, "UFO" clearly me
by dfxm12 5y ago
The parent poster is not talking about "the idea of UFOs", they're talking about aliens among us!
This is an issue - as this disconnect shows, "UFO" clearly means different things to different people, so it's easy to see how a seemingly clear message can be understood very differently among a large group of people (and maybe a conspiracy is born/given more fuel).
This doesn't just happen with "UFOs" either.
- ostenning 5y ago"Visiting Earth" in my mind means entering Earths atmosphere, but yeah I cant comment on if aliens could be walking among us, but if they had made it to our atmosphere, why wouldn't they go the extra couple of km's?
- jjk166 5y agoThe point is that just because there is something unidentified does not mean its aliens.
- orwin 5y agowhy would they visit us? We have an average sun, a weird planet with a bit too much iron, but no more ressources than any other planetary system. Would they want to study us? In this case they have a technology capable of contourning any physic law we nknow of, and bypassing any method of detecting invisible objects based on particles that we know exist, and still manage to disable this tech at weird moments? Because of a glitch? And don't get me started on Alien "crashes". (also, if they are among us and capable of feat we can't imagine, this is hugely improbable that the presence is recent. Like one in a billion) There is two solutions: Either aliens visited us or they didn't. If they did, this would be VERY concerning that their software is glitching that bad. My rational theory is this: Aliens visited us or did not, and i don't really care (treating them the same as god or any new-age consciousness theory), but UFOs are a bigger proof of human bias than alien visit in any case.