3 ms·
> And nothing has changed about that. Yet - it's a prediction based on the capability of future hardware that seems plausible. > Let's see the hardware that "
by fossuser 5y ago
> And nothing has changed about that.
Yet - it's a prediction based on the capability of future hardware that seems plausible.
> Let's see the hardware that "doesn't suck", let's see the UI and utility that "are there" and then I'll tell you if we have a winner or not.
Yeah sure, it's way easier to make predictions in hindsight after other people have already built it. Even then - when the iPhone launched in 2007 it was largely panned in a similar way to what you're doing now.
Making accurate predictions is hard - I agree with that. If you dismiss everything you'll be right a lot of the time, but you'll also miss every big and interesting change until someone else builds it.
- shirhan 5y agoComparing the launch of the iPhone with the "launch" of a prediction blog post void of any idea how said AR device is even going to work is honestly absurd.
- Supermancho 5y ago> it's a prediction based on the capability of future hardware that seems plausible. And nuclear fusion reactors are only 20 years away. That's a concrete goal and it's more likely than some vague new "metaverse". I promise, you'll still be posting on HN when anything resembling a shadow of this is released.