3 ms·
The other way around is definitely easier. RNA-seq analysis is a mostly solved problem with DESeq2 (or edgeR/limma). The tutorials are very detailed. The mos
by timy2shoes 5y ago
The other way around is definitely easier. RNA-seq analysis is a mostly solved problem with DESeq2 (or edgeR/limma). The tutorials are very detailed. The most difficult part is experimental design, which you probably know already.
Deep learning, on the other hand, is so fraught with pitfalls and traps. Even if you can code up a model successfully, it's very easy to trick yourself that you're doing very well (see a previous discussion at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27376839 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27376839). In my opinion, most of the work should be spent on making sure that you're not tricking yourself.
- dekhn 5y agoliterally the first 5 years of training in any large scale data analysis should be "how not to trick yourself into thinking you found something significant that generalizes"
- selimthegrim 5y agoSo then why I am getting static from these PIs? Do they have some R01 report deadline a year away breathing down their necks?