1. Are you suggesting eyewitness testimony is reliable? If this is your position, then why shouldn't we take ghosts and supposed religious phenomena seriously?

1. Are you suggesting eyewitness testimony is reliable? If this is your position, then why shouldn't we take ghosts and supposed religious phenomena seriously? 2. Your supposed "experts" are relying on equipment they do not understand that regularly produce phenomena they do not understand. Ironically, I think you've made a good case that philosophers (experts) should be the ones tackling this issue.