4 ms·

Does anyone know how easy this would be to abuse by staging a ransomware attack?

by okamiueru 5y ago

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
tiku 5y ago
Ransomware as a (tax)service
- mrodozov 5y ago
  thats what I said
  - tiku 5y ago
    gmta.
11235813213455 5y ago
As much as fake donations I guess
- ElViajero 5y ago
  > As much as fake donations I guess So, a lot.
amelius 5y ago
How comfortable are you about filing a police report against yourself?
- idiotsecant 5y ago
  If you're trying to illegal embezzle or evade taxes I think this is just one more thing to add to the list, wouldn't be a big problem.
usrusr 5y ago
Also a nice way to keep profits in the hands of hard working management if those pesky shareholders fail to grant them sufficient bonuses /s But I doubt that it could happen like that, the skillset requirements just don't have the overlap it would take. But taking some liberties extrapolating a dark future, imagine what would happen if key persons who failed particularly hard at avoiding payment suddenly found themselves with unsolicited keys for wallets containing some amount of finder's fee. Deniable, yes, but how much would that deniability be worth in the end? If that could be the future of business computing, should we buy stocks of fax machine companies?
- oyser 5y ago
  Curious why you think the skill sets don’t overlap. I see them as perfectly compatible and no different then any other embezzlement that can happen.
  - usrusr 5y ago
    Could you really pull it off without some data actually missing? Perhaps, but with a big risk of discovery. On the other hand, perhaps you are right: if you have a well established, highly authorized and maybe a bit isolated crisis intervention plan/team they should be able to initiate preventative lockdown protocols perfectly indistinguishable from the real thing, with only a very small conspiracy knowing that it was started for no good reason.
toomanybeersies 5y ago
About as easy as committing tax fraud by claiming losses from any other form of criminal activity, such as farmers burning down their barn and claiming the loss, or construction contractors claiming losses on "stolen" tools.
refurb 5y ago
Sure. But now transfer the money from the “criminals” back to you in some untraceable way. Oh, and that’s money laundering, so additional charges on top of tax fraud.

Does anyone know how easy this would be to abuse by staging a ransomware attack?

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]

tiku 5y ago

Ransomware as a (tax)service

mrodozov 5y ago
thats what I said
- tiku 5y ago
  gmta.

11235813213455 5y ago

As much as fake donations I guess

ElViajero 5y ago
> As much as fake donations I guess So, a lot.

amelius 5y ago

How comfortable are you about filing a police report against yourself?

idiotsecant 5y ago
If you're trying to illegal embezzle or evade taxes I think this is just one more thing to add to the list, wouldn't be a big problem.

usrusr 5y ago

Also a nice way to keep profits in the hands of hard working management if those pesky shareholders fail to grant them sufficient bonuses /s But I doubt that it could happen like that, the skillset requirements just don't have the overlap it would take. But taking some liberties extrapolating a dark future, imagine what would happen if key persons who failed particularly hard at avoiding payment suddenly found themselves with unsolicited keys for wallets containing some amount of finder's fee. Deniable, yes, but how much would that deniability be worth in the end? If that could be the future of business computing, should we buy stocks of fax machine companies?

oyser 5y ago
Curious why you think the skill sets don’t overlap. I see them as perfectly compatible and no different then any other embezzlement that can happen.
- usrusr 5y ago
  Could you really pull it off without some data actually missing? Perhaps, but with a big risk of discovery. On the other hand, perhaps you are right: if you have a well established, highly authorized and maybe a bit isolated crisis intervention plan/team they should be able to initiate preventative lockdown protocols perfectly indistinguishable from the real thing, with only a very small conspiracy knowing that it was started for no good reason.

toomanybeersies 5y ago

About as easy as committing tax fraud by claiming losses from any other form of criminal activity, such as farmers burning down their barn and claiming the loss, or construction contractors claiming losses on "stolen" tools.

refurb 5y ago

Sure. But now transfer the money from the “criminals” back to you in some untraceable way. Oh, and that’s money laundering, so additional charges on top of tax fraud.