Unproven medical treatments are a kind of speech that the US government has aggressively suppressed with the approval of the courts for many years. That situati

Unproven medical treatments are a kind of speech that the US government has aggressively suppressed with the approval of the courts for many years. That situation was abused to suppress the works of Wilhelm Reich (~70 years ago) but I don't see that kind of abuse here. Youtube isn't subject to the first amendment 'cause it's not the government BUT also the first amendment hasn't protected this kind of expression for a long time. Just sayin'. Edit: and as other said, that the drug is legal is irrelevant and disingenuous. We're talking a new treatment system.