4 ms·
Correct would be lex mala, lex nulla (omit one L).
by _nalply 5y ago
Correct would be lex mala, lex nulla (omit one L).
- Aeolun 5y agoThis is weird. Even I can see that it seems to say nothing but: Bad law, no law. Does latin have an implied ‘better than’ in sequences?
- blix 5y agoWhat's implied here is 'is', i.e. "a bad law is no law." The phrase seems to be a rehash of a quote from St Augustine: "lex iniusta non est lex" meaning "an injust law is not a law", which is more clear.