4 ms·

I bet Ronaldo will move the drinks again, and I think he should. Without the players there is no game.

stanislavb 5y ago
Oh, I so much hope you are right and he does that. It'd be so fun. In the end of the day, even if they fine him, that will increase his personal brand value :D
- rusk 5y ago
  and will hit theirs
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
bellyfullofbac 5y ago
Well he's got the clout that UEFA don't dare be tough with him, if he gets mad the backlash against UEFA and Coca-Cola will be even greater, and the PR consultants working for them know this...
mdoms 5y ago
Without sponsors there are no players.
- hkt 5y ago
  Actually, fans and players can get along without sponsors. There is also a long list of prospective sponsors who don't peddle fizzy drinks that the talent (or fans) might object to.
  - Scoundreller 5y ago
    > There is also a long list of prospective sponsors who don't peddle fizzy drinks that the talent (or fans) might object to. Might be hard to find, there’s not that many global brands out there where you can advertise once and hit the world. Unhealthy food and beverage make up a lot of the sector. Even Google or Apple don’t hit the China market well. Even multinational car manufacturers sub-brand way too much.
- slipframe 5y ago
  That's bullshit though. People will still be playing football even if nobody is getting paid. Why? Because it's fun. To corporations like Coca Cola, 'fun' is an abstract concept that you associate with your product to make more money; such corporations can never truly understand the concept of fun.
  - movedx 5y ago
    > That's bullshit though Whoa! Calm down. It was a statement that we both know to be wrong, but it doesn't warrant this kind of response.
    - slipframe 5y ago
      Just because I used a word you think is offensive, doesn't mean you should insult me by insinuating that I've lost control of myself. Such an insinuation is more inherently insulting than any four-letter word.
    - deleted 5y ago
      [deleted]
- aaomidi 5y ago
  TIL people don't play sports when there's no sponsor
- mc32 5y ago
  There would be, just not as highly paid. Take 70s pay and adjust for inflation. That approximation probably wouldn’t be far off. No sponsors, no TV, no TV, less exposure, smaller market, revenue would come from attendance and some merchandising maybe (without sponsors).
  - zibzab 5y ago
    No TV?
ipython 5y ago
Perhaps he should just place a sticky label over top of the logo at the next press conference. After all, they said he couldn’t move the drinks…
- movedx 5y ago
  I love it! He could also take little cardboard boxes that cover the bottles just perfectly, with something like, "Drink Fresh! Drink Water!" all over them. Again, "I didn't move the bottles! I never even so much as touched them!"
  - thatguy0900 5y ago
    Considering the headlines I'm not sure the drink maker would even care.

Oh, I so much hope you are right and he does that. It'd be so fun. In the end of the day, even if they fine him, that will increase his personal brand value :D

rusk 5y ago
and will hit theirs

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]

bellyfullofbac 5y ago

Well he's got the clout that UEFA don't dare be tough with him, if he gets mad the backlash against UEFA and Coca-Cola will be even greater, and the PR consultants working for them know this...

mdoms 5y ago

Without sponsors there are no players.

hkt 5y ago
Actually, fans and players can get along without sponsors. There is also a long list of prospective sponsors who don't peddle fizzy drinks that the talent (or fans) might object to.
- Scoundreller 5y ago
  > There is also a long list of prospective sponsors who don't peddle fizzy drinks that the talent (or fans) might object to. Might be hard to find, there’s not that many global brands out there where you can advertise once and hit the world. Unhealthy food and beverage make up a lot of the sector. Even Google or Apple don’t hit the China market well. Even multinational car manufacturers sub-brand way too much.
slipframe 5y ago
That's bullshit though. People will still be playing football even if nobody is getting paid. Why? Because it's fun. To corporations like Coca Cola, 'fun' is an abstract concept that you associate with your product to make more money; such corporations can never truly understand the concept of fun.
- movedx 5y ago
  > That's bullshit though Whoa! Calm down. It was a statement that we both know to be wrong, but it doesn't warrant this kind of response.
  - slipframe 5y ago
    Just because I used a word you think is offensive, doesn't mean you should insult me by insinuating that I've lost control of myself. Such an insinuation is more inherently insulting than any four-letter word.
  - deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]
aaomidi 5y ago
TIL people don't play sports when there's no sponsor
mc32 5y ago
There would be, just not as highly paid. Take 70s pay and adjust for inflation. That approximation probably wouldn’t be far off. No sponsors, no TV, no TV, less exposure, smaller market, revenue would come from attendance and some merchandising maybe (without sponsors).
- zibzab 5y ago
  No TV?

ipython 5y ago

Perhaps he should just place a sticky label over top of the logo at the next press conference. After all, they said he couldn’t move the drinks…

movedx 5y ago
I love it! He could also take little cardboard boxes that cover the bottles just perfectly, with something like, "Drink Fresh! Drink Water!" all over them. Again, "I didn't move the bottles! I never even so much as touched them!"
- thatguy0900 5y ago
  Considering the headlines I'm not sure the drink maker would even care.