5 ms·

Yeah also if you compare results from google vs duckduckgo for controversial search terms like "I don't care about gender identity" Google will return only con

• PhantomGremlin 5y ago
  Whereas duckduckgo will return stuff that actually matches your search. One upon a time Google was a really cool search engine. Entire books were written about how to use it wisely. E.g. Google Hacks 100 Industrial-Strength Tips & Tools https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/google-hacks/0596004478/ https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/google-hacks/0596004478... Now, it's impossible to properly qualify searches. Quotes don't mean shit. Appending "&tbs=li:1" to get verbatim results doesn't mean shit. Google just does whatever the hell it wants to. Which is probably great for the unwashed masses but really sucks for advanced users.
  • deertick1 5y ago
    Thank you. Could not agree more. I remember when you could finesse google for really odd or specific shit and its damn near impossible now.
• meisel 5y ago
  Can you provide more examples of this?
  • quacked 5y ago
    Look up "proof the moon landing was fake". I have an aerospace degree and don't think it was fake, but I still find it strange that Google won't return any of the conspiracy pages I enjoyed reading about a decade ago.
    • crazygringo 5y ago
      Probably not strange since they probably have very low PageRank, visits, etc. On the other hand, the top Google results go to The Guardian, Wikipedia, Time, the BBC, etc., discussing the topic -- hugely popular sites. Google's meant to find popular relevant pages for your search terms. Remember, that's what PageRank was all about. So seems to be working as expected.
      • Blikkentrekker 5y ago
        This does run into the same problem that Wikipedia runs into, that it insists on using “credible” or “reputable” sources but does not really bother to define that, and it essentially comes down to that sources are not “credible” for disagreeing with their beliefs. Personally, I have yet to see any “credible” news source and the adage remains that every news article about anything I have even the most minor inside knowledge of seems completely inaccurate, especially the politically laden ones. No matter what mechanism Google uses to assign such ranking: be it their own judgement or simply an agnostic a.i. that lets the masses decide, I cannot see anything good coming from it and there will always be a bias not based in factuality, but politics.
        • crazygringo 5y ago
          ...you don't see anything good coming from Google search results? ...that it's incentivized to return the results that the most people are looking for? As measured by clicks? If you don't believe the news and you don't find popularity useful either then I honestly can't imagine what you're even looking for then.
          • deertick1 5y ago
  • NaturalPhallacy 5y ago
    Search for "list of conservatives removed from twitter" on google vs. DDG. Google returns a list of left leaning sources down playing it, DDG returns a list of right leaning sources condemning it. The results are night and day different.
    • deertick1 5y ago
      Ah interesting example. Thanks. Also your username gave me a chuckle
• cfgghsj 5y ago
  They call it prioritizing "authoritative sources" over organic results.
• A4ET8a8uTh0 5y ago
  Damn. That is a controversial statement? I am a rebel again.
• gowld 5y ago
  Google is personalized to some extent. I don't see what you are describing at all.
• thrwawy11jun21 5y ago
  Searched Google and DDG for "I don't care about gender identity" google top: reddit post about "What are you if you just don't give a fuck about gender and you have no kind of dysphoria?" DDG top: blog post titled "Don’t care about gender Self-ID? Here’s why you should"
  • Blikkentrekker 5y ago
    I also echo this; I'm not sure what exactly the poster you replied to suggests. Both normal and incognito on Google return similar results to what was returned to you.
  • pjc50 5y ago
    The second one is part of the anti-trans campaign.
• crazygringo 5y ago
  What are you even talking about? I just Googled "I don't care about gender identity" and the top results are all agreeing with that statement. The search is working perfectly. Google isn't inserting any kind of left-wing bias whatsoever. It's finding the same types of pages as DuckDuckGo does as well. So why are you spreading this misinformation?
  • deertick1 5y ago
    I hadn't tried that particular search. Heres on I have tried and just double checked it : "I don't care about transgender rights" The example further down about the moon landing is a much better example though. Its a lot worse right when some political event happens. Like if trump said sonething really controversial and you search for more context around it, on google top results would all be articles about how shitty the thing he said was whereas on DDG youd have a greater probability of actually getting some context. Like when pandemic was in full swing trying to get information that was against the mainstream narrative was impossible on google but was doable on ddg. This might not be like an active decision by google but their results do skew really heavy left. It might just be a function of popularity rankings. But id imagine ddg uses a similar ranming system so not sure what makes the difference. There are times tho when ive searched for something I know exists like word for word and it still wont come up on google but will on ddg so, go figure.
    • Cd00d 5y ago
      > I hadn't tried that particular search So, the one example you provided you hadn't taken the 10 seconds to validate? You're not providing value here. Please make an effort to make meaningful and additive comments instead of spewing misinformation or made up anecdotes.
      • deertick1 5y ago
        Yeah or not? I also said try it yourself. And what value are you adding with this comment sir? My point stands shitty example or not.
• brunoTbear 5y ago
  I'd ask if that error might be better understood as downranking of two things that seem very reasonable to downrank in a search engine (something designed to return accessible and useful information): - bigots motivated by animosity towards minorities - open contempt for the truth Hard to feel there's a compelling interest in supporting bigotry when knowledge is best advanced by open inquiry and the net result of bigotry is a suppression of voices which will lead to less knowledge. As to conspiracies and lies? Very little truth value there, unclear why Google would want to uprank that kind of content. Were there real debates about truth with actors in good faith on both sides, I might be more open to your framing of the problem as left wing vs right wing.
  • deertick1 5y ago
    Yeah so thats the thing. You are just immediately assuming that you are right and everyone who disagrees is wrong and a horrible person. Personally, I see people obsessed with gender identity as being wrong, anti-truth, anti science, disingenuous, etc. So thats my point : I don't want google to give me the truth, I want it to give me the internet, warts and all. I don't want google to gatekeep the information I have access to. Lol I remember everyone being in a tizzy when net neutrality gor the axe cause ISPs would start gatekeeping. But if a wholesome company like google does it its in pursuit of truth.
    • danso 5y ago
      Why did you start using Google in the first place? Their early papers on PageRank/BackRub describes how their algorithm filters for quality, and their most prominent example is explicitly political: http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html > As an example which illustrates the use of PageRank, anchor text, and proximity, Figure 4 shows Google's results for a search on "bill clinton". These results demonstrates some of Google's features. The results are clustered by server. This helps considerably when sifting through result sets. A number of results are from the whitehouse.gov domain which is what one may reasonably expect from such a search. Currently, most major commercial search engines do not return any results from whitehouse.gov, much less the right ones. > ...The biggest problem facing users of web search engines today is the quality of the results they get back. While the results are often amusing and expand users' horizons, they are often frustrating and consume precious time. For example, the top result for a search for "Bill Clinton" on one of the most popular commercial search engines was the Bill Clinton Joke of the Day: April 14, 1997. Google is designed to provide higher quality search so as the Web continues to grow rapidly, information can be found easily.
• jfoster 5y ago
  > Google always errs on the side of left wing political platform Reminds me that yesterday I tried googling around the topic of how covid affects fertility (eg. "covid fertility") and nearly every result that comes back is about vaccines not affecting fertility. Okay, thanks Google, but how about the actual disease? Results were a fair bit more relevant by adding "disease" to the query, but still got one or two about vaccines. I don't think you can call that behaviour favouring left. It feels as though they're creating vaccine hesitancy.
  • deertick1 5y ago
    Perfect example. Had the exact aame experience. As someone who leans more right wing, I call it left skewed, but yes you are right it is not necessarily purely left aligned, or even at all. It feels like just any controversial opinion just gets obliterated by their ranking algorithm (in the case if covid I would bet a million dollars there was manual intervention in the name of public health tho)
    • jfoster 5y ago
      But in this case they're transforming a concern about covid into a concern about the covid vaccine. Doesn't even make sense in the name of public health.
  • Blikkentrekker 5y ago
    Perhaps much of it is not ideological on Google's part but actually simply the machine learning about what people want to see. It's entirely possible that such a disproportionate number of persons is more likely to access links about vaccines and such politics than what you searched for that the machine, not the man, has elected to favor those without having any real political motive.
    • deertick1 5y ago
      Definitely the more likely scenario. Possible there is some gaming of the algorithms but yeah its just a popularity thing chiefly. I wish google was more concerned with accuracy of matches rather than populatrity
• TazeTSchnitzel 5y ago
  You're making a huge leap by assuming this is because such a subject isn't politically correct or whatever. There's many more likely explanations: • You have phrased the search in a way that people expressing that view wouldn't be likely to use, yet is similar to how people holding contrary views would express theirs. I think that's the case here. If you search for “gender does not exist” or so, you may get the results you want. • Google's results are customised based on what they think you would be interested in. • Content from one side of a contentious topic may be less popular online and/or not linked to as many authoritative sites, and thus have a lower PageRank.
  • deertick1 5y ago
    1) my point was specifically if you search for a phrase that would have been used one 1 side of an argument you often get the other side if its a politically contentious issue. E.g. why would a blog that is pro gender identity related stuff contain the phrase "I dont care about gender identity" 2) so I am clearly of a more conservative bent, yet google frequently gives articles which are hostile to conservative views. So if its doing this its doing a terrible job. 3) agreed. And that is, imo, problematic. Or at least really fucking obnoxious and kneecaps the utility of google.
• Der_Einzige 5y ago
  Another issue is the usage of BERT and other dense vector techniques. These are not as good at bm-25/tf-idf for information retrieval. This is one reason why google search results these days do a poor job when you need direct keyword based results. Also, google has always personalized their search results (personalized pagerank) and maybe that's impacting you?