3 ms·

Well, Postgres is F/OSS, so I expect the solution to problems to be "lots of small tools"... but I see the same kind of herculean battle-plans for MS SQL Server

by Pxtl 5y ago

Well, Postgres is F/OSS, so I expect the solution to problems to be "lots of small tools"... but I see the same kind of herculean battle-plans for MS SQL Server work, and I get shocked. That is a paid product, what on Earth are we paying for?

marcosdumay 5y ago
> what on Earth are we paying for? The same is the same for any relational DBMS: lock-in.
worewood 5y ago
You're paying for an "if something goes wrong and it's the software's fault you can sue us" license
- senko 5y ago
  You're not. Approximately 25% of SQL Server EULA text deals with ways in which the warranty is limited. The best the license gives you is your money back if you prove that it was the software's fault. Of course, you can always sue. A $2T company. Good luck with that.
  - doctor_eval 5y ago
    Went to post the same thing but HN had a little downtime burp. Would only add that the main reason people buy these licenses, apart from familiarity, is so they can shift the blame if something goes wrong. Its all about ass covering.
    - salmo 5y ago
      Well, this and 1) the illusion of "support" 2) OSS-fearing companies' love of indemnification
    - fridif 5y ago
      it likely wasnt downtime and rather a "you are posting too many messages and we will pretend that the whole site is down rather than telling you"
- afarrell 5y ago
  You’re presumably paying for a relationship with someone who has expertise.