3 ms·
“Chronically underperforming” seems a bit overly dramatic when degradation is 0.5% worse than expected. While tracking field performance is important, that d
by tw04 5y ago
“Chronically underperforming” seems a bit overly dramatic when degradation is 0.5% worse than expected.
While tracking field performance is important, that doesn’t really change the equation of solar being cheap energy.
- cure 5y agoWell, you can look at it that way, or you can say that the degradation appears to be 100% worse than expected. They modeled 0.5% and it seems real world numbers are more like 1% , at least for the installations they observed.
- ishtanbul 5y agoIt is a very significant difference in terms of investor returns which are already very low in the base case of p50 and very sensitive to changes in output