3 ms·
this is a bit ambiguous in title. This is about vaccination not providing any further benefit to those who have recovered and cleared from covid. this is ^not
by rolph 5y ago
this is a bit ambiguous in title.
This is about vaccination not providing any further benefit to those who have recovered and cleared from covid.
this is ^not^ saying you need to be vaccinated even if you have gone through covid
- dang 5y agoOk, I've consed an 'evaluating' onto the title above in the hope of communicating this.
- rolph 5y agothanks dang
- takeda 5y agoOn the other hand this says the opposite: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.15.440089v4?fbclid=IwAR0iLKEST1oTbc7r0qGoPuydW8pF58fSEzzW7zwRanEntwbi9KHazAXozWw https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.15.440089v4?...
- rolph 5y agoThe abstract actually contradicts itself. not only that there is a comparison of vaccine generated Ab titre reacting with spike receptor domain vs naturally generated Ab titre reacting with spike receptor domain, and with nucleocapsid features thus the naturall immunity is broader, and is long lasting based on opsonizing immunity.