3 ms·
Yes, because capital ownership is private. Perhaps we should rethink that?
by andrepd 5y ago
Yes, because capital ownership is private. Perhaps we should rethink that?
- fastball 5y agoWhy?
- chii 5y ago> Perhaps we should rethink that? hasn't it already been tried, and shown to fail?
- andrepd 5y agoThere's a universe of possibilities between unrestrained globalised hyper-financialised capitalism, and murdering people who wear glasses and making everybody work on agriculture a la Cambodia. Ideas like Georgism allow us to retain the most useful features of a market economy while taming its brutal, violent, undemocratic features. That's the premise of market socialism in general.