> You're saying that because of the lack of transparency in the bidding process No, I am not saying that at all. Please cite where I said that there was a lack

> You're saying that because of the lack of transparency in the bidding process No, I am not saying that at all. Please cite where I said that there was a lack of transparency. I only said that the parent poster would need information in order to make a case, and without that information no case could be made. I have no idea how transparent the process was and whether the relevant oversight controls were properly enforced, nor did I make any claims or assumptions about that, although it sounds like you have some assumptions of your own. If so, please back them up -- if you think there was impropriety in the bidding process, then again some evidence is called for.