Well put. It is an absurd argument up to the point of "reasonableness" that it's the responsibility of the company to defend against 100% of theoretical securi

Well put. It is an absurd argument up to the point of "reasonableness" that it's the responsibility of the company to defend against 100% of theoretical security vulnerabilities, in my opinion. There will always be a vulnerability, unless some truly secure-by-design technology exists .. airgap, not vulnerable to social engineering .. ?