4 ms·
It was a post from 14 years he's apologized for. I'm sure everyone has plenty of beliefs from 14 years ago that no longer fits their current beliefs.
by ehsankia 5y ago
It was a post from 14 years he's apologized for. I'm sure everyone has plenty of beliefs from 14 years ago that no longer fits their current beliefs.
- annexrichmond 5y agoTrue, but it seems like most aren't given a second chance like he was.
- ehsankia 5y ago> most aren't given a second chance like he was. Most are almost never put in a position where things they've done or said over a decade ago is put under a spotlight. You have to be in a specific position, and have people specific want to take you down in the first place. Why do you think this specific post from 14 years ago happens to have been brought up now?
- capableweb 5y agoBut if Google thought he was now benign, wouldn't he just remain at the post? Moving him to a different department seems to indicate that Google think he did wrong, but not that much wrong as to fire him. I'm not sure how to reconcile that.
- duxup 5y agoIsn't there space in the sense that "this role isn't right for you because you did a thing" and "let's try here"?
- datavirtue 5y agoThey want him to quit.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- ehsankia 5y agoIt's just a bad look specifically for the head of DEI, who's whole job is to promote diversity. If it was any other position they probably wouldn't have cared.