3 ms·
So people aren't allowed to criticise the system they live under? Every time I see this take, I am reminded of this comic: https://thenib.com/mister-gotcha/ ht
by foxrob92 5y ago
So people aren't allowed to criticise the system they live under?
Every time I see this take, I am reminded of this comic: https://thenib.com/mister-gotcha/ https://thenib.com/mister-gotcha/
- xiphias2 5y agoYou are right, it's OK to criticize the system, it's just frustrating for me as a Bitcoin holder to be criticized for Bitcoin using 0.1% of the worlds energy while for example for video gamers not getting the same criticism. Take away Netflix, my car or social media from me, I don't care, I will live fine without them. But take away my Bitcoin and my life gets devastating, just like for other people who realized that their savings are done (I'm not afraid of Bitcoin going away though). As for NFTs, sure, right now they are useless, but I see them as experiments for the future of digital ownership accounting in the future.
- foxrob92 5y agoBitcoin mining is a colossal waste of energy (given it's at about 1.2MWh currently to confirm a single transaction, and that number is basically nondecreasing). People playing video games are at least deriving some enjoyment from it. There are less wasteful methods of exchange than BTC.
- chii 5y ago> People playing video games are at least deriving some enjoyment from it not that i believe in bitcoin, but why can't they equivalently claim that mining bitcoins would derive enjoyment? after all, enjoyment is subjective. The problem with people claiming mining btc is a waste, is that they are attributing a set of moral and ethical rules that they themselves see as absolutely correct, and anyone who do not ascribe to those rules are scums.
- jlokier 5y agoThink about that 1.2MWh per transaction. Compare it with the power consumption of video gaming. They are not even in the same ballpark, not remotely.
- foxrob92 5y agoIt's absurd. repeating what I said elsewhere - my desktop at home has a 650W PSU. It would take ~76 days of full power for that to consume as much energy as a single BTC transaction.
- foxrob92 5y ago>The problem with people claiming mining btc is a waste It takes ~1.2 MWh to confirm a single transaction right now. My fridge at home consumes approx 300 kWh/year. Are you saying that a single BTC transaction verification provides anywhere near the utility as refrigerating food for four years? Even comparing it to gaming, my desktop at home has a 650W PSU. It would take ~76 days of full power for that to consume as much energy as a single BTC transaction. There's orders of magnitude more energy being used by BTC, but I don't think there's orders of magnitude more benefits. >but why can't they equivalently claim that mining bitcoins would derive enjoyment? Got any evidence for that?
- chii 5y ago> Are you saying that a single BTC transaction verification provides anywhere near the utility as refrigerating food for four years? judging by the price, yes it does apparently. And that's where your opinion differs from mine - i don't place a utility judgement on the use of energy. If somebody is willing to pay for their use of electricity, they deserve to use it. As an outsider, i don't get to police anyone else's use of their electricity they pay for, no matter what i think of the actual use. Of course, this presumes that the cost of the electricity is not somewhat externalized. Unfortunately, that is not quite the case today.
- foxrob92 5y ago