> They don't whitewash anything, in fact they even keep the option open to re-assess their position should further details come to light. Did I miss something?

> They don't whitewash anything, in fact they even keep the option open to re-assess their position should further details come to light. Did I miss something? All I can gather from the announcement PDF is that “several individuals” have been disciplined to varying degrees, the least severe being just a warning letter. No names named, no other details. Most of the announcement was just reiterating they took the investigation seriously. Kind of hard to determine from the announcement what details have and have not been considered, and whether certain individuals have been punished too lightly, no? The announcement does mention a confidential report has been submitted for further review. Did anything concrete ever come out? (I suppose it would at least be relatively obvious after a while which individuals are subject to a 15-year ban.)