3 ms·
If you assume that lung damage is to an extent irreversible and accumulates over time (peobbat less true for pre-puberty children than adults), then you'd expec
by alisonkisk 5y ago
If you assume that lung damage is to an extent irreversible and accumulates over time (peobbat less true for pre-puberty children than adults), then you'd expect lung damage to be less immediately fatal in the young yet still have similar effect, just delayed.
- nradov 5y agoThat is not a valid assumption. There is no evidence that lung damage is common in children, or that it is irreversible.