3 ms·

Absolutely, and you’ll find many other studies that contradict the above. Plus good old fashioned common sense. Here’s a meta review. https://www.sciencedirect

• crackercrews 5y ago
  That's not more recent, it's a decade older than the meta analysis showing that there are not material behavioral effects.
  • disgruntledphd2 5y ago
    If by material, you mean less than d=0.3, then you appear to be correct. It's gonna be really difficult to estimate reliable effects from a meta-analysis of such disparate studies, which is normally the case in psychology. Anyway, it would make sense that cognitive interventions are more effective, as this would suggest that a lot of implicit biases represent pre-conscious reactions (which is interesting in and of itself).
    • msrenee 5y ago
      Don't worry, if you read even the just article he linked, you'll realize that the quote he pulled is out of a list of multiple reasons their metastudy did not come up with conclusive results. There's a list of possibilities, and there not being a correlation is a possibility, but due to the nature of metastudies, they are not willing to make that statement.
      • msrenee 5y ago
        *multiple possible reasons.
• rimliu 5y ago
  Common sense tells us that the Earth is flat and ths Sun rotates around it. Just look outside, is it not obvious?