9 ms·

I have never understood Maxwell's demon at all and would love if anyone could explain its significance.

ncallaway 5y ago
The general idea of Maxwell's demon as a problem is that it conflicts with the second law of thermodynamics, which essentially states that the total entropy of a closed system will increase over time. Which, essentially, implies that if we have a (perfectly sealed closed system) box of gaseous particles well mixed at temperature T, then we will never observe that box eventually separates into two different temperatures of gas with a T(cold) on the left side of the box and a T(hot) on the right side of the box. However, if we already had a box that was separated into two different temperatures of gas, we would expect those gasses to eventually become well-mixed over time. The paradox of Maxwell's Demon was that we had this apparently closed system (gas particles + Demon), that wasn't doing any Work, but apparently had the ability to violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The thinking was that this shouldn't be possible, even in principle. With the caveat that the second-law of thermodynamics is a statistical law, so it's really saying "the odds of entropy decreasing by any significant amount is extremely vanishingly improbable"
- FranOntanaya 5y ago
  What bothers me is, we derive entropy --a blind, involuntary physical law--, from observation of inanimate systems. So, for example, a very big box full of hot hydrogen will eventually cool off. But, there's a tiny chance it may actually coalesce into life bearing stars. Such life may intentionally work towards increasing order, like Maxwell's demon. So we try to extend entropy to life too and strenuously prove that it'll increase even when aware biological organisms work against it, while still excluding the same organisms from the observations entropy is derived from.
  - exporectomy 5y ago
    Are there no natural non-biological processes which decrease entropy locally just as life does? Surely something like a weather system does that, doesn't it?
    - coderenegade 5y ago
      Crystals might be another example.
  - lovemenot 5y ago
    Talking about physical entropy (Boltzmann) or information entropy (Shannon), in either case we must consider the system or channel. Entropy only has meaning in respect of a system. There is no "universal* application of the second law. Entropy within a system may very well decrease so long as more entropy is exported from that system. Living organisms import low entropy such as food. And they export higher entropy. The balance in a notional system that encompasses both the organism and its energy source, wrt beyond that system, will be a net inrease in its entropy.
  - gus_massa 5y ago
    It's easier to understand with a refrigerator. A refrigerator decrease the entropy inside (ice cube have low entropy) but it increase the entropy outside, so the total amount of entropy in the universe increase. There are even some refrigerators that instead of electricity have a burner for alcohol, that for me is very weird. Now imagine a big box filled with Hydrogen an a refrigerator (with batteries or something). The entropy inside the refrigerator will decrease, but the total entropy will increase. Now imagine a that there is a star in the big box of Hydrogen, and the refrigerator has a solar panel. The entropy inside the refrigerator will decrease, but the total entropy will increase. Life is just that, a weird solar powered refrigerator.
itronitron 5y ago
One application of Maxwell's demon would be to sort hot atoms in a gas from cold atoms thus allowing you to create both an efficient heater and air conditioner.
- yesenadam 5y ago
  That sounds a lot like a vortex tube, a tube with no moving parts that separates a stream of air into hot and cold, which at first sounds kind of impossible! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_tube https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_tube http://vortextube.scienceontheweb.net/index.html http://vortextube.scienceontheweb.net/index.html
  - deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]
  - fsh 5y ago
    The essential difference is that you have to put in energy to pump the fluid through the tube. Essentially a vortex tube is simply a very inefficient refrigerator that is fully in agreement with the second law of thermodynamics. With Maxwell's demon it is not immediately obvious that it has to do work in order to sort fast from slow atoms.
  - es7 5y ago
    Wikipedia mentions that the inefficiency of that is less than a normal AC unit even. So the vortex tube is actually using up more of the energy in the system than you might originally expect
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
jayd16 5y ago
Here's a simple way to understand the situation. Imagine you have a room of uniform pressure. Air particles are bouncing around at random speeds but its chaotic and uniform. The randomness means that there will be moments where the rooms pressure is not EXACTLY uniform. Now image you have a demon that can divide the room at one of those times. The demon does not work on the particles in the room. It simply divides the room. ...But now you have two rooms with a pressure differential. You can use that difference to do work and it will only return the rooms to uniform pressure again. You get work for free. How can this be? This is the paradox.

The general idea of Maxwell's demon as a problem is that it conflicts with the second law of thermodynamics, which essentially states that the total entropy of a closed system will increase over time. Which, essentially, implies that if we have a (perfectly sealed closed system) box of gaseous particles well mixed at temperature T, then we will never observe that box eventually separates into two different temperatures of gas with a T(cold) on the left side of the box and a T(hot) on the right side of the box. However, if we already had a box that was separated into two different temperatures of gas, we would expect those gasses to eventually become well-mixed over time. The paradox of Maxwell's Demon was that we had this apparently closed system (gas particles + Demon), that wasn't doing any Work, but apparently had the ability to violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The thinking was that this shouldn't be possible, even in principle. With the caveat that the second-law of thermodynamics is a statistical law, so it's really saying "the odds of entropy decreasing by any significant amount is extremely vanishingly improbable"

FranOntanaya 5y ago
What bothers me is, we derive entropy --a blind, involuntary physical law--, from observation of inanimate systems. So, for example, a very big box full of hot hydrogen will eventually cool off. But, there's a tiny chance it may actually coalesce into life bearing stars. Such life may intentionally work towards increasing order, like Maxwell's demon. So we try to extend entropy to life too and strenuously prove that it'll increase even when aware biological organisms work against it, while still excluding the same organisms from the observations entropy is derived from.
- exporectomy 5y ago
  Are there no natural non-biological processes which decrease entropy locally just as life does? Surely something like a weather system does that, doesn't it?
  - coderenegade 5y ago
    Crystals might be another example.
- lovemenot 5y ago
  Talking about physical entropy (Boltzmann) or information entropy (Shannon), in either case we must consider the system or channel. Entropy only has meaning in respect of a system. There is no "universal* application of the second law. Entropy within a system may very well decrease so long as more entropy is exported from that system. Living organisms import low entropy such as food. And they export higher entropy. The balance in a notional system that encompasses both the organism and its energy source, wrt beyond that system, will be a net inrease in its entropy.
- gus_massa 5y ago
  It's easier to understand with a refrigerator. A refrigerator decrease the entropy inside (ice cube have low entropy) but it increase the entropy outside, so the total amount of entropy in the universe increase. There are even some refrigerators that instead of electricity have a burner for alcohol, that for me is very weird. Now imagine a big box filled with Hydrogen an a refrigerator (with batteries or something). The entropy inside the refrigerator will decrease, but the total entropy will increase. Now imagine a that there is a star in the big box of Hydrogen, and the refrigerator has a solar panel. The entropy inside the refrigerator will decrease, but the total entropy will increase. Life is just that, a weird solar powered refrigerator.

itronitron 5y ago

One application of Maxwell's demon would be to sort hot atoms in a gas from cold atoms thus allowing you to create both an efficient heater and air conditioner.

yesenadam 5y ago
That sounds a lot like a vortex tube, a tube with no moving parts that separates a stream of air into hot and cold, which at first sounds kind of impossible! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_tube https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_tube http://vortextube.scienceontheweb.net/index.html http://vortextube.scienceontheweb.net/index.html
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
- fsh 5y ago
  The essential difference is that you have to put in energy to pump the fluid through the tube. Essentially a vortex tube is simply a very inefficient refrigerator that is fully in agreement with the second law of thermodynamics. With Maxwell's demon it is not immediately obvious that it has to do work in order to sort fast from slow atoms.
- es7 5y ago
  Wikipedia mentions that the inefficiency of that is less than a normal AC unit even. So the vortex tube is actually using up more of the energy in the system than you might originally expect

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]

jayd16 5y ago

Here's a simple way to understand the situation. Imagine you have a room of uniform pressure. Air particles are bouncing around at random speeds but its chaotic and uniform. The randomness means that there will be moments where the rooms pressure is not EXACTLY uniform. Now image you have a demon that can divide the room at one of those times. The demon does not work on the particles in the room. It simply divides the room. ...But now you have two rooms with a pressure differential. You can use that difference to do work and it will only return the rooms to uniform pressure again. You get work for free. How can this be? This is the paradox.