> The article for this post is a pretty good source: 100% rate for the dog indicating the presence of drugs is pretty much a rubber stamp. If you read the arti

> The article for this post is a pretty good source: 100% rate for the dog indicating the presence of drugs is pretty much a rubber stamp. If you read the article you will find a description that the dog didn't alert the first time around the car, didn't alert the second time around the car, and only alerted after the cop maliciously signaled to the dog that they want an alert. To me that doesn't sound like a bad dog, it sounds like a bad cop.