3 ms·
> But the human world is not exact and full of context. That is of course correct. However, it was my impression that the contract mentioned in the OP was comp
by sva_ 5y ago
> But the human world is not exact and full of context.
That is of course correct. However, it was my impression that the contract mentioned in the OP was completely on the blockchain, and therefore completely deterministic (no oracles or whatever.) Hence I figured it could've been proved with absolute rigor, in which case it should've been possible to formally prove the correctness. I'll be honest, I didn't look through the contract in detail now, so I might be wrong.
- Daishiman 5y agoIt's possible that maybe, just maybe, the interior world of some crypto scheme may have sufficient formal proofs. It doesn't change the fact that the crypto system lives in a human world were law, politics and attacks can coerce you to do a lot of things and the formality of the system is just irrelevant.