3 ms·
> I could make a similar argument to say not to use CSS files, just embed everything into the page. Then the poor user has to download heavier html on every pa
by markdown 5y ago
> I could make a similar argument to say not to use CSS files, just embed everything into the page.
Then the poor user has to download heavier html on every page as the browse the site.
- michalc 5y agoI actually think there are cases for this. Say, you have a small amount of CSS and/or the user will in all probability just look at the one page on the site.
- markdown 5y agoThere absolutely are, and I've done it myself. But it's a rare site that would really benefit from the method.
- grenoire 5y agoWebdevs usually forget that neither practically unlimited bandwidth nor quotas should be take for granted. A lot of people have slow internet connections, don't make 'em suffer.
- Dylan16807 5y agoYeah but the first load is faster!