4 ms·
"Studies of groups of people who received polio vaccine during 1955–1963 provide evidence of no increased cancer risk." [1] [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
by onlyrealcuzzo 6y ago
"Studies of groups of people who received polio vaccine during 1955–1963 provide evidence of no increased cancer risk." [1]
[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25057632/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25057632/
- zackees 6y agoNIH is corrupt and often covers for big pharma which funds it. SV40 has consistently been found in tumors across the body: https://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/67/17/8065.short https://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/67/17/8065.short
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- onlyrealcuzzo 6y agoCorrelation does not equal causation. A virus being found in a tumor doesn't mean it caused it.
- sm0ss117 6y agoQuick rule of thumb, the reason we associate it with cancer is because the only ppl we systemically tested for it had cancer. If you tested everybody you'd probably find it in everybody since it was in a mandatory vaccine
- Supermancho 6y agoI think a quick google search has steered you wrong. I don't think this is a huge story (I've never heard of SV40 before reading this thread), but just a little deeper...reading the executive summary, the story seems less clear cut. "The committee concludes that the biological evidence is moderate that SV40 exposure could lead to cancer in humans under natural conditions." And there's more. SV40's probably also transformative (observed in both mammals and humans) and the vaccine has moderate evidence of causality. Then there's the strange disappearance of the CDC page awhile back - http://www.laleva.org/eng/2013/07/cdc_disappears_page_linking_polio_vaccines_to_cancer-causing_viruses.html http://www.laleva.org/eng/2013/07/cdc_disappears_page_linkin... And the papers correlating the virus to cancer: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10472327/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10472327/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16966607/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16966607/ etc