2 ms·
I would need you to go back and edit your posts insinuating there was no proof before I have any interest in continuing the conversation. I get the impression
by tw04 5y ago
I would need you to go back and edit your posts insinuating there was no proof before I have any interest in continuing the conversation. I get the impression you're more interested in trolling than having a conversation based in facts.
- tored 5y agoPlease point me to when I said there was no proof for Manafort giving Kilimnik polling data. (I didn't, what I was skeptic about was that Manafort gave Russian Intelligence sensitive campaign data and that there was connection from the Trump campaign to Russian Intelligence). Now, please answer my question.