3 ms·
I had tried the project two years ago, but after a few days I had too many unauthorized accesses, because the project was still in the early stages. Has anyone
by x14km2d 5y ago
I had tried the project two years ago, but after a few days I had too many unauthorized accesses, because the project was still in the early stages. Has anyone had some experience in the meantime or is this still an "insider" project?
- danielEM 5y agoPersonally didn't like that there was no option for setting any transfer limits, using it with limited mobile plan is like "internet suiccide"
- yawnxyz 5y agonone of the examples on the homepage work, so I'm assuming it's still wonky
- ilaksh 5y agoWhat do you mean unauthorized accesses? IPFS is heavily used for NFTs.
- jazzyjackson 5y agoWhich, unfortunately, is full of folks who don’t understand that the image disappears when no ones hosting it. People call the IPFS the “perma-web” and expect their content to be hosted in perpetuity for free. Imaging paying for artwork and not downloading a copy because you think it’s archived. Poor art buyers.
- nicbou 5y agoSo it's like torrents when they have no seeders?
- Zetaphor 5y agoYes, same basic idea. IPFS requires at least one client to be "pinning" the content. Pinata seems to be the preferred choice for NFT's, creating a significant weak point in the ecosystem.
- mattdesl 5y agoThe preferred choice is just to pin your content directly, here’s an example with Hicetnunc: https://gist.github.com/mattdesl/47f4ea12ea131eed8401bdacf95a1f47 https://gist.github.com/mattdesl/47f4ea12ea131eed8401bdacf95...
- hinkley 5y agoMagical thinking by people who ridicule others for magical thinking. What a piece of work is man...