5 ms·
No. There is an opportunity cost for every action you take. Bathroom choices don't matter if the world is on fire and in danger of causing mass extinction and
by ta8645 5y ago
No. There is an opportunity cost for every action you take. Bathroom choices don't matter if the world is on fire and in danger of causing mass extinction and hardship due to global warming. There will be nobody around to mislabel or choose the wrong bathroom.
If you truly believed we were in actual peril, you wouldn't waste time on pronouns and bathrooms.. you'd be too busy trying to save the human race. Since that isn't what you're doing, you make all the hand wringing about climate look insincere.
- Dylan16807 5y agoPeople are allowed to care about multiple things, and don't have to dedicate their life to the most important cause they can think of. Your dismissal could be used for basically anything. Why waste time arresting a mere murderer? Why stop a company from dumping toxic waste, it's only a few barrels. Why inspect a building to make sure it doesn't collapse, those are super rare. If you actually cared about people you'd be working on one of the biggest five problems and not those!
- ta8645 5y agoOf course you're allowed to care about multiple things. The point is that you wont be very convincing to anyone that there is an emergency if you're also attending to less important things. If you're house is on fire, you're allowed to also sew a skirt. But it's not very wise. If you are worried about pronouns and bathrooms.. you clearly aren't very worried about the so called climate EMERGENCY.
- Dylan16807 5y agoBut again you can apply that argument do anything. Are you worried about bathrooms? Must not be a climate emergency. Do you want to cook breakfast? Must not be a climate emergency. Do you have a light turned on? Must not be a climate emergency. Really, you're just making an argument not to use the word "emergency" for this kind of geopolitical problem. Okay, whatever, sure. But let's go back to the original argument, not your strawman tangent. "We have some massive societal problems to deal with relating to wealth inequality, housing, and public health, but none of it seems to matter as a large segment of the population is convinced that, e.g. transgender people wanting to use the restroom that matches their presented gender is the largest ongoing attack on our collective well-being." Being able to use a bathroom and not be harassed or have to defend your identity is on par with the rest of that list. The protection of rights is on par with massive societal issues. Complaining about someone coming to pee is not on par with that. Neither one is an "emergency" the way you're using it, but nobody was saying that.
- ta8645 5y agoYou can play all the word games you want, but the fact remains if you treat bathrooms and pronouns on the same level as an existential crisis, demanding that people attend to both at the same time... don't be surprised when people don't take your absurdity seriously. If you truly care about saving the environment, i'd suggest getting your messaging in order. Unless you really truly don't care. https://people.com/human-interest/scientific-american-drops-climate-change-will-use-climate-emergency-instead/ https://people.com/human-interest/scientific-american-drops-...
- Dylan16807 5y ago> if you treat bathrooms and pronouns on the same level as an existential crisis I wasn't doing that. Nobody was doing that. It's not a word game; you're complaining about something that didn't happen. You're the one that brought up climate.