4 ms·
what i know is that it is inherently harder to have good GC performance with mutable language and as i said D has a very small community Java is on the opposit
by systems 5y ago
what i know is that it is inherently harder to have good GC performance with mutable language
and as i said D has a very small community
Java is on the opposite side of this spectrum its immensely popular, and as I understand it took Java several iteration, and tons of resources before gaining good performance, and still today, Java optimization is a specialized experts job
- pjmlp 5y agoD also suffers from the community always racing after the next big thing without fixing the current set of issues.
- vips7L 5y ago> Java optimization is a specialized experts job No its not. Modern Java GC's require 0 tuning. ZGC with default settings can achieve submillisecond pauses. > and as i said D has a very small community Java is on the opposite side of this spectrum its immensely popular, and as I understand it took Java several iteration, and tons of resources before gaining good performance This wasn't your argument. You stated that mutability was the reason that D couldn't have a good GC, not the size of its community or resources. According to tiobe D is more popular than OCaml as well.