3 ms·
Those requirements are welcome to be negotiated. But negotiation often isn't occurring in good faith. There's way too much flat-earth- holocaust-denial- style
by thwarted 5y ago
Those requirements are welcome to be negotiated.
But negotiation often isn't occurring in good faith. There's way too much flat-earth- holocaust-denial- style arguments from those who "just don't want to be told what to do". Getting vaccinated doesn't take away someone's liberties; "I don't want to be told what to do" is not an argument against vaccination. Many of these people are just making noise, and it's getting old.
I'm not saying there aren't good arguments for not getting vaccinated, but it falls flat when those same people got vaccinated in order to attend public school or have state issued IDs or use passports or will bitch about a loved one dying because they failed to get vaccinated.
- kofddfjdfdfdff 5y agoMandating medical interventions is pretty much taking away someone's liberties. And your opinions about other people's opinions are also irrelevant as an argument.
- thwarted 5y agoAre you daft? I'm not offering what I think of other people's opinions as an argument about vaccination. I'm responding to your assertion that there is actually valuable debate to be had with rubes whose only argument is "I don't like being told what to do".
- mygoodaccount 5y ago> Are you daft? This style of dialogue is not welcome here. Try Reddit.
- sharken 5y agoWell put and my thoughts exactly. Hacker News is a great place for all kinds of information and great discussions too. Let's try and keep it that way.
- radu_floricica 5y agoTone and discourse. We're not debating the merits of vaccinations here. We're talking about how this way of making conversation is ultimately toxic. > There's way too much flat-earth- holocaust-denial- style arguments from those who "just don't want to be told what to do". This is how you want the discourse to look like? Somebody puts an argument, and gets labeled flat earther. Do you know Gell Mann amnesia? I shared an article the other day on facebook and got it flagged as "out of context". As it happens, it was something not out of context, just slightly against the mainstream. What do you think this did to my confidence in the mainstream? And before you say that my article must have been wrong, let me remind you that the mainstream was against wearing masks 12 months ago. Hell, CDC was against wearing ffp2 masks... I don't know, 3 months ago? Civil discourse and tone are much more important long term than just winning conversation points. Sure, go for points if you want. But every time you say things like "flat earth", you take a small chip out of the boat we're all in.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]