7 ms·
Chipotle bumps pay to 15$, adds benefits in push to hire 20k
- bern4444 5y agoWho would have thought. Amongst all the companies complaining they can’t find workers, they seem to all maintain a truly massive cognitive dissonance and lack of complete self reflection. Good for Chipotle for demonstrating actual leadership. If anyone here is a fan of the tv show The West Wing, I always like the quote You are so fond of calling yourselves the "leaders of the free world." So, lead. I feel companies often so enjoy calling themselves and being called leaders in their industry but they forget to actually lead and demonstrate leadership
- toomuchtodo 5y agoChipotle has repeatedly been found to perform wage theft at scale, so let’s not get excited too quickly until the results are in.
- 07121941 5y agohttps://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/amazon-renews-call-15-dollar-federal-minimum-wage/#:~:text=In%20CEO%20Jeff%20Bezos'%202018,competition%20that%20will%20benefit%20everyone.%E2%80%9D https://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/amazon-renews-call-15... I'm no economist, but I'm pretty sure this just out prices small businesses. Bigger businesses can take the strain and get some great PR.
- bern4444 5y agoA fair point. Perhaps it will also outprice other similar sized businesses too though
- kevinventullo 5y agoOne could view this as the efficiency gains due to economies of scale being passed on to workers.
- whimsicalism 5y agoGood, let's free up capital for enterprises that can better compensate workers.
- Proven 5y agowut? when was that not the case in the US? have top wages ever been capped? you completely misunderstand what's going on.
- arcticbull 5y agoThis sounds like capitalism at work! And, not in a bad way for once haha. I've always found it interesting that the plague was one of the major drivers of the elimination of serfdom in western Europe. When half the population died, workers suddenly found themselves in high demand. They were able to demand better working conditions and dramatically higher wages. [1] I'm hoping for a softer version of this in high unemployment payments. Personally, I'm ok with business who can't afford to pay employees a living wage going under and being replaced by ones that are willing to. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequences_of_the_Black_Death https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequences_of_the_Black_Deat...
- bern4444 5y agoI agree with you a good bit as well. This is a rare opportunity where employees have a slight upper hand and don't have to be dictated to for once. I think what many businesses of all sizes often forget is that you get back what you give, usually as a multiple. Further, this increased return is often overlooked or ignored since its not immediately measurable until the action (increasing employees' pay) is taken. The flip side being, an increase in wages is an immediately determinable cost and so becomes the initial focus.
- proc0 5y agoIMHO, the problem here is they could have done this before. Forcing them to do so has wider implications for smaller companies, so maybe the real solution could have been some way to specify which kind of companies should have a minimum wage. I think Chipotle is in a position to do this while many other companies wil ljust have to eliminate positions.
- true_religion 5y agoThe minimum wage already eliminates positions. It’s just that thanks to inflation, every year more and more tenuous jobs can be made available since the minimum wage doesn’t track the rising revenue. Given enough time, the minimum wage would simply cease to be impactful. We should reset the minimum wage to at least levels on par with what it would be inflation adjusted. That impact on the economy was the intention of the law in the first place. Jobs that are lost are jobs we never intended to exist in the first place. Remember, you can still do lower than minimum wage work if you work for yourself. With a hiked wage, no longer will corporations be able to capture this section of the market, and instead small businesses can do it instead which would be more stimulative for the economy.
- proc0 5y ago> Jobs that are lost are jobs we never intended to exist in the first place. I'm not so sure of that, we couldn't possibly assess the full impact here, but I guess we'll see what happens. I would think constraining large companies only would be the solution here, and small companies have more options because presumably the employer and employee relationship is much tighter and they can sort things out better. Hope it works out for the best.
- thatguy0900 5y agoWasn't the original minimum wage meant to support a family on one income? Is that really a realistic goal in a modern two worker family setting?
- bern4444 5y ago
- perl4ever 5y agoI just heard an ad on the radio from a local grocery store chain, advertising jobs in their warehouse and saying they pay $20/hr, have benefits, insurance, etc. A number of businesses have signs on the doors saying they are hiring at $15/hr - I think Burger King, Home Depot... It's disappointing that when Republicans say unemployment benefits are preventing people from going back to work, that Democrats just deny it - they should say "yes of course, that's the point!" And then go on to explain why it's good for the economy and idolatry of unemployment numbers is wrong.
- neither_color 5y agoOn the flip side the costs of many essentials are going up and the fewer people employed at the higher prices will be buying less with their 2021 $15 than they could've with their 2019 $15, but if people are satisfied with simply seeing a higher numerical value on their paycheck so be it. https://www.wsj.com/articles/consumers-adjust-to-higher-prices-11620552601 https://www.wsj.com/articles/consumers-adjust-to-higher-pric...
- whimsicalism 5y ago> 2021 $15 than they could've with their 2019 $15 Still far more than they would have been buying with the $7.25/hr of course. These wage increases are almost certainly net welfare enhancing due to diminishing marginal utility of the dollar.
- arcticbull 5y agoNot to mention, the Fed has tools to counter inflation, which they will almost certainly deploy.
- zodiakzz 5y agoNoob question: What does that consist of (other than halting currency printing)?
- listenallyall 5y agoHeadline should clarify AVERAGE (not starting or minimum) pay = $15/hour. Lots of individuals will still earn less
- dharmab 5y ago> The wage increase for new and existing hourly and salaried employees will be implemented over the next few weeks, the company said. The upgraded pay scale will result in hourly employees earning starting wages ranging from $11 to $18.
- listenallyall 5y ago...confirming my point
- snypher 5y agoI wouldn't even call it average. In my experience most people will be getting $11.
- listenallyall 5y agoMy comment, claiming $15 was the average, was based off of the first sentence of the linked article: "Facing an industry-wide labor shortage, fast food chain Chipotle is bumping up its average pay to $15 an hour by the end of June, resulting in wages of $11 to $18 an hour"
- randompwd 5y agoHeadline is editorialized and false: > The upgraded pay scale will result in hourly employees earning starting wages ranging from $11 to $18.
- cwwc 5y agosorry -- you're right
- canadianfella 5y ago$15/hour