I agree. What's worse is how the article tries to look at financial success, happiness, popularity, reproductive success, etc. Those things are rather subjecti

I agree. What's worse is how the article tries to look at financial success, happiness, popularity, reproductive success, etc. Those things are rather subjective, and depends on philosophy and politics. It only looks at shades of good or bad. There is no nuance. Comparing people and putting them in categories is pointless.