3 ms·
in practice, this all means: to be able to apply, you have to have worked 3+ times as non union. Which is usually unpaid or paid extremely low. This is even wo
by lurkerasdfh8 5y ago
in practice, this all means: to be able to apply, you have to have worked 3+ times as non union. Which is usually unpaid or paid extremely low.
This is even worse on the side-unions, such as costume, etc.
- munk-a 5y agoIn practice there may be shifty individuals specifically exploiting the situation - but it sounds like SAG requires that it members be well compensated and treated fairly and tries to make it easy to approach joining the union from a number of different angles. If there's exploitation going on here I don't think it's really fair to attribute it to SAG in particular (though I'm not certain if you ever were, your original comment just mentioned the exploitation of hollywood - not specifically that SAG was driving this). Maybe it's more the case that a landscape that's likely to be rife with exploitation (and actors and abstract artists are extremely vulnerable to exploitation as a class of employee due to the strange quality of the value they produce) is actually made a little bit better by SAG ensuring that most actors are getting a fair shake?